Language and Knowledge in Plato’s Cratylus and Beyond it

Viktor Ilievski

Abstract


The argument of Plato’s Cratylus is conducted along the lines of examination of two conficting theories of correctness of names, namely conventionalism and naturalism; in the course of the dialogue Socrates demonstrates that none of the theories provides truly accurate account of the names-objects relation. His own standpoint is that language is unreliable and that things should be investigated and learned about through themselves, rather than through their images, the names. This conclusion pushes the phonetic and semantic investigations aside, and establishes the supremacy of eidetic epistemology over its onomatic counterpart. The main objectives of this paper will be: a) to follow the interplay of Socrates’ arguments by which he challenges both theories of correctness of names, and b) to briefly investigate the implications and the impact of the eidetic epistemology thesis on Plato’s general attitude toward language. In order to accomplish the second objective, I shall turn to the Seventh Letter and point out some affnity between its philosophic digression and the conclusions of the Cratylus. Thus it will be shown that Plato’s attitude toward language was not very favorable, and that his method of dialectic was devised in such a way as to ultimately avoid and overcome the pitfalls of language.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ademollo, Francesco. The Cratylus of Plato: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Print.

Barney, Rachel. Names and Nature in Plato’s Cratylus. New York: Routledge, 2001. Print.

Benson, Hugh H. “Plato’s Method of Dialectic.” A Companion to Plato. Ed. Hugh H. Benson, London: Blackwell Publishing, 2006. 85-99. Print.

Cornford, Francis M. Plato’s Theory of Knowledge. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co. Ltd., 1935. Print.

Davidson, Donald. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980. Print.

Demand, Nancy. “The Nomothetes of the ‘Cratylus.’” Phronesis 20.2. (1975): 106-109. Print.

Деретић, Ирена. Како Именовати Биће. Београд: Филип Вишњић, 2001. Print.

Kahn, Charles H. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Print.

Keller, Simon. “An Interpretation of Plato’s ‘Cratylus.’” Phronesis 45.4. (2000): 284-305. Print.

Ketchum, Richard J. “Names, Forms and Conventionalism: ‘Cratylus’ 383-395.” Phronesis 24.2. (1979): 133-147. Print

Levinson, Ronald B. “Language and the ‘Cratylus’: Four Questions.” The Review of Metaphysics 11.1. (1957): 28-41. Print.

MacDonald, Cynthia. Varieties of Things: Foundations of Contemporary Metaphysics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2005. Print.

Marković, Miroslav. Filozofja Heraklita Mračnoga. Beograd: Nolit, 1983. Print.

Modrak, Deborah K.W. “Meaning and Cognition in Plato’s Cratylus and Theaetetus.” Topoi 31 (2012): 167-174. Print.

Morrow, Glenn R. “The Theory of Knowledge in Plato’s Seventh Epistle.” The Philosophical Review 38.4. (1929): 326-349. Print.

Plato. “Cratylus.” Tr.C.D.C. Reeve. Plato: Complete Works. Ed. John. M. Cooper, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1997. 101-156. Print.

Платон. Кратил. Прев. Весна Томовска-Митровска. Скопје: Магор, 2006.

Plato. “Letter VII.” Tr. Glenn R. Morrow. Ed. John. M. Cooper, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1997. 1646-1667. Print.

Plato. “Republic.” Tr. G. M. A. Grube, rev. C. D. C. Reeve. Plato: Complete Works. Ed. John. M. Cooper, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1997. 971-1223. Print.

Penner, Terry. “Socrates and the Early Dialogues.” The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Ed. Richard Kraut, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. 121-169. Print.

Robinson, Richard. “A Criticism of Plato’s Cratylus.” The Philosophical Review 65.3. (1956): 324-341. Print.

Sedley, David. “The Etymologies in Plato’s Cratylus.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies 118 (1998): 140-154. Print.

——— “The Ideal of Godlikeness.” Plato 2: Ethics, Politics, Religion, and the Soul. Ed. Gail Fine, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. 309-328. Print.

——— Plato’s Cratylus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Print.

——— “Plato on Language.” A Companion to Plato. Ed. Hugh H. Benson, London: Blackwell Publishing, 2006. 214-227. Print.

Schofeld, Malcolm. “A Displacement in the text of the Cratylus.” The Classical Quarterly 22.2. (1972): 246-253. Print.

Stenzel, Bertha. “Is Plato’s Seventh Epistle Spurious?” The American Journal of Philology, 74.4. (1953): 383-397. Print.

Stewart, John A. Plato’s Doctrine of Ideas. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1909. Print.

Taylor, Alfred E. “The Analysis of Episteme in Plato’s Seventh Epistle.” Mind 21.83. (1912): 347-370. Print.

——— Plato: The Man and His Work. London: Methuen, 1926. Print.

Thomas, Christine J. “Inquiry Without Names in Plato’s Cratylus.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 46.3. (2008): 341-364. Print.

Weingartner, Rudolph H. “Making Sense of the ‘Cratylus’.” Phronesis 15.1. (1970): 5-25. Print.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.