TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF INDEPENDENT PHONOLOGICAL MEASURES OF 2-YEAR-OLD SPEECH: A PILOT STUDY

Katherine Marie WITTLER, Shari Leigh DEVENEY

Abstract


Introduction: Within the field of speech-language pathology, many assume commonly used informal speech sound measures are reliable. However, lack of scientific evidence to support this assumption is problematic. Speech-language pathologists often use informal speech sound analyses for establishing baseline behaviors from which therapeutic progress can be measured. Few researchers have examined the test-retest reliability of informal phonological measures when evaluating the speech productions of young children. Clinically, data regarding these measures are critical for facilitating evidence-based decision making for speech-language assessment and treatment.

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to identify the evidence-base regarding temporal reliability of two such informal speech sound measures, phonetic inventory and word shape analysis, with two-year-old children.   

Methods: The researchers examined analyses conducted from conversational speech samples taken exactly one week apart for three children 29- to 33-months of age. The videotaped 20-minute play-based conver­sational samples were completed while the children interacted with their mothers. The samples were then transcribed using the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) and analyzed using the two informal measures noted above.

Results: Based on visual inspection of the data, the test-retest reliability of initial consonant and consonant cluster productions was unstable between the two conversational samples. However, phonetic inventories for final consonants and word shape analyses were relatively stable over time.

Conclusion: Although more data is needed, the results of this study indicate that academic faculty, clinical educators, and practicing speech-language pathologists should be cautious when interpreting informal speech sound analyses based on play-based communication samples of young children.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Paul R. Introduction to clinical methods in communication disorders. Third edition. Baltimore, Maryland USA: Brookes; 2014.

Bernthal J, Bankson N, Flipsen, P. Articulation and phonological disorders: Speech sound disorders in children. Seventh edition. Boston, Massachusetts USA: Pearson; 2013.

Morris, SR. Test-retest reliability of independent measures of phonology in the assessment of toddlers’ speech. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2009; January;40(1):46–52.

Preston JL, Ramsdell, HL, Oller, KD, Edwards, ML, Tobin, SJ. Developing a weighted measure of speech sound accuracy. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 February;54(1):1–18.

Shriberg LD, Austin D, Lewis BA, McSweeny JL, Wilson DL. The Percentage of Consonants Correct (PCC) Metric Extensions and Reliability Data. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 August;40(4):708–722.

Heilmann J, DeBrock L, Riley-Tillman TC. Stability of measures from children’s interviews: The effects of time, sample length, and topic. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2013; August;22(3):463–475.

Van Severen L, Van Den Berg R, Molemans I, Gillis S. Consonant inventories in the spontaneous speech of young children: A bootstrapping procedure. Clinical Linguistic & Phonetics 2012; February;26(2):164–187.

Zimmerman IL, Steiner VG, Pond RE. Preschool language scales. Fifth edition. Boston, Massachusetts USA: Pearson; 2011.

Fenson L, Dale PS, Reznick JS, Thal D, Bates E, Hartung JP, Reilly JS. MacArthur communicative development inventories. San Diego, California USA: Singular; 1993.

Oller DK, Ramsdell HL. A weighted reliability measure for phonetic transcription. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2006; December;49(6):1391–1411.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19057/jser.2016.11

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Article Metrics Graph

No metrics found.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.