GUIDED READING PROGRAMME FOR PRISONERS: AN OUTCOME-ORIENTED APPROACH

Zeljka BAGARIĆ, Ljiljana MIKŠAJ-TODOROVIĆ, Ksenija BUTORAC

Abstract


As part of a more comprehensive pilot – study this paper deals with the verification of the first Guided Reading Programme conducted within the Croatian prison system, in the period from June 1st to September 1st, 2012. The subjects were adult male prisoners serving long-term sentences in a medium security prison. The results of the Verbal and Communication Skills, Transcendental Insight and Improving Reading Habits scales of two groups of prisoners were compared, at the initial and final measurement points of the programme. The first group participated in Programme activities (P group, N=8) in contrast with the second group which did not participate in the same activities of  Programme (NP group, N=8), but agreed to complete the scales. All the prisoners participated voluntarily. The criteria for the  selection  of  participants  in  both groups were:

completion of four – year secondary school education, preserved cognitive functioning and intrinsic motivation.

The data were analysed by the following non-parametric tests: Mann-Whitney test, Chi squared test and programs COCHCOX and METDIF1.

Group P showed better results than group NP at the initial (p < 0.05 in 6 variables) and final points of measurement (p < 0.05 in 5 variables), which means that their statements were significantly more positive and healthier. Conclusively, the programme is useful for personal development of inmates and has a positive impact on their rehabilitation.

Keywords


programme, reading, inmates, prison system, verbal deficiency

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lustig MW. Verbal Reticence: A Reconceptualization and Preliminary Scale Development. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago; 1974.

Bagaric Z. Model suradnje narodnih knjiznica i zatvorskog sustava u Republici Hrvatskoj: Model of Cooperation of Public Library and Penal System in Republic of Croatia. Dissertation. Zagreb: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb; 2013.

Zakon o izvrsavanju kazne zatvora: Law on execution of the prison sentence. Croatian Official Gazette, Nos; 128/99, 55/00, 59/00, 129/00, 59/1, 67/01, 190/03, 76/07, 27/08, 83/09, 18/11, 56/13, 150/13.

De Villa S. Zatvorske knjiznice u Republici Hrvatskoj. Masters Thesis. Zagreb: Faculty of Philosophy, University of Zagreb; 2007.

Burt LN. Bibliotherapy: Effects on Group Reading and Discussion on Attitudes of Adult Inmates in Two Correctional Institutions: Final report. National centre for educational research and development (DHEW/OE), Washington, D.C.; 1972.

Rubin RJ. Using Bibliotherapy: A Guide to Theory and Practice. Phoenix: Oryx Press; 1978.

Jarjoura GR, Krumholz ST. Combining Bibliotherapy and Positive Role Modeling as an Alternative to Incarceration. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 1998; 28 (1-2): 127–139.

Sweeney M. Reading Is My Window: Books and the Art of Reading in Women’s Prisons. University of North Carolina Press; 2010.

Jaworska A. Alternative Therapy in Penitentiary Resocialisation: Prison Smart program in Poland. Dissertation. Cracow: Faculty of Humanities, Pedagogical University of Cracow; 2009.

Hartley J, Turvey S. Reading Together: the Role of the Reading Group Inside Prison. Prison Service Journal 2009; 183: 27–32.

Taylor C. Reading Programs Offer Alternative to Jail. County News. National Association of Counties 2010; 42(19).

Gendreau P. 1998 Margaret Mead Award Address: Rational Policies for Reforming Offenders. Maeve McMahon, eds. In: Assessment to Assistance: Programs for Women in Community Corrections. Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association, 2000; 329–338.

Sherman LW, Gottfredson DC, MacKenhzie DL, Eck J, Reuter P, Bushway SD. Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising. Report to the U.S. Congress. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. Of Justice; 1998.

Cullen FT, Applegate, BK. Offender Rehabilitation: Effective Correctional Intervention. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate/ Dartmouth; 1997.

Pardeck JT, Pardeck JA. Bibliotherapy: a Clinical Approach for Helping Children. USA: Gordon and Breach; 1993.

Hakemulder JF. The Moral Laboratory: Experiments Examining the Effects of Reading Literature on Social Perception and Moral Self-concept. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2000.

Zuric Jakovina I. Citanje kao transfer: tekst i kontekst (samo) pomoci u knjigama za samopomoc i psihoterapijskim romanima. [Reading as a transfer: Text and context of (self) help in self-help books and psychotherapeutic novels]. Dissertation. Zagreb: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb; 2013.

Djikic M, Oatley K, Zoeterman S, Peterson JB. On Being Moved by Art: How Reading Fiction Transforms the Self'. Creativity Research Journal 2009; 21(1): 24–29.

Kuiken D, Miall DS, Sikora S. Forms of Self Implication in Literary Reading. Poetics Today 2004; 25: 171–203.

Miall DS., Kuiken D. A Feeling for Fiction: Becoming What We Behold. Poetics 2002; 30: 221–241.

Schwab G. Cultural Texts and Endopsychic Scripts. SubStance 2001; 30 (1&2): 160−176.

Currie M. Postmodern Narrative Theory. New York: Palgrave; 1998.

Boulanger V. Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage: Project Odyssee. CNRS/Université Lyon; 2010.

Mar RA. Simulation-based Theories of Narrative Comprehension: Evidence and implications. Dissertation. Toronto: University of Toronto; 2007.

Zunshine L. Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. James Phelan and Peter J. Rabinowitz, eds. In: Theory and Interpretation of Narrative Series The Ohio State University; 2006.

Polvinen M. Book Review: Lisa Zunshine’s Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. The Electronic Journal of the Department of English at the University of Helsinki. Volume 5; 2009.

Mar R, Oatley K. The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2008; 3(3): 173–192.

Andrews DA, Bonta J., Hoge, RD. Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior 1990; 17: 19–52.

Andrews DA, Bonta J. The Risk-Need-Responsivity model of assessment and human service in prevention and corrections: Crime-prevention jurisprudence. The Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal justice 2007; 49:439–464.

Nikolic B, Bilic-Prcic A, Pejcinovic R. Metrijske karakteristike instrumenata opisanih na malim uzorcima. Hrvatska revija za rehabilitacijska istrazivanja 2005; 41(1): 57–72.

Bagaric Z, Miksaj-Todorovic Lj. Citanje u rehabilitaciji zatvorenika: Reading in Rehabilitation of Prisoners. Citaliste. Forthcoming; 2014.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JSER-2015-0006

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Article Metrics Graph

No metrics found.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.