DYNAMICS OF THE COMPELEX FORMS OF VISUAL PERCEPTION IN CHILDREN OF PRE-SCHOOL AGE (A NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS)

Neli VASILEVA

Abstract


Introduction: Experimental data in preschool aged children proves the determining role of the auditory and visual processes for future reading skills, therefore the investigation of complex forms of visual perception in this age period is diagnostically important.

Objectives: Basic aim of the research is assessment of the sensitive period for the non-verbal perceptive operations in pre-school aged children, and determination of subgroup with low results for non-verbal perception.

Methods: The dynamics of the visual per­ception (visual gnosis) in typically develop­ing children were tested with an adapted version of the Poppelreuter-Ghent Test for figure-ground segregation. The total number of overlapping objects is 33, grouped accor­ding to the level of difficulty. The children are given a group of objects separately in a following sequence and they should segregate and name the objects. 

Results: A number of 365 typically develop­ing children without diagnosis of visual disorders and without corrected visus took part in the research. All children, aged 4, 5, and 6 from three different settlements attend state nursery schools and have Bulgarian as a mother tongue. A three-factor dispersion analysis was held to define the statistical significance of the independent factors age, gender and settlement. The research’s data define the 5 year olds as sensitive about the dynamics of the complex forms of visual perception, compared to the four year old children (p<0.000009) and the six year old children (p<0.001650). The influence of the demographic factor is engaged with the significantly better results of the children from the big town compared to the capital (p<0.000926) and small town (p<0.000700). The influence of the gender as a factor is due to the better functioning of the non-verbal perceptive operations in the females (F = 1,346, p<0.019). According to the additional analysis, 25% of the children at the age of six demonstrate a low rating of the complex forms of non-verbal visual gnosis that could be reviewed as risk for developing dyslexia.  

Conclusion: In the age period 4 – 6, there is a process of dynamic maturation of the right-hemispheric structures of the ventral visual system, leading to substantial improvement of the abilities for discrimination of objects in visual crowding. Poppelreuter’s test allows an objective assessment of the state of the non-verbal perceptive abilities in pre-school age and could be used in the diagnostics of predictors for dyslexia. 


Keywords


visual gnosis in complex environment; Poppelreuter-Ghent Test; figure-ground segregation; dorsal and ventral visual pathways; preschool age; developmental dyslexia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ackerman PT, Dykman RA. Phonological processes, confrontational naming, and immediate memory in dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities 1993; 26(9):597–609.

Fawcett AJ, Nicolson RI. Naming speed in children with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities 1994; 27:641–646.

Korhonen TT. The persistence of rapid naming problems in children with reading disabilities A nine-year follow-up. Journal of Learning Disabilities 1995; 28(4): 232–239.

Araújo S, Faiska L, Petersson K, Reis A. What does rapid naming tell us about dyslexia? Avances en Psycologia Latinoamericana 2011; 29(2):199–213.

Badian NA. Does a visual-orthographic deficit contribute to reading disability? Annals of Dyslexia 2005; 55:28–52.

Hood M, Conlon E. Visual and auditory temporal processing and early reading development. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice 2004; 10: 234–252.

CornelissenPL, HansenPC, Gilchrist I, Cormack F, Essex J, Frankish C. Coherent motion detection and letter position encoding. Vision Research 1998; 38:2181–2191.

Olson R, Datta H. Visual-temporal processing inreading-disabled and normal twins. Reading and Writing, 2002; 15:127–149.

King B, Wood C, Faulkner D. Sensitivity to auditory and visual stimuli during early reading development. Journal of Research in Reading, 2007; 30: 443–453.

Pammer K, Kevan A. The contribution of visual sensitivity, phonological processing, and nonverbal IQ to children’s reading. Scientific Studies of Reading 2007; 11:33-53.

Gori S, Facoetti A. How the visual aspects can be crucial in reading acquisition: The intriguing case of crowding and developmental dyslexia. Journal of Vision, 2015; 15(1):1–20.

Facoetti A, Trussardi A, Ruffino M, Lorusso M et al. Multisensory Spatial Attention Deficits Are Predictive of Phonological Decoding Skills in Developmental Dyslexia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2012; 22 (5): 1011–1025.

Franceschini S, Gori S, Ruffino M, Pedrolli K, Facoetti A. A Causal Link between Visual Spatial Attention and Reading Acquisition. Current Biology, 2012; 22, 814–819, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.013.

Stein J, Walsh V. To see but not to read: The magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends in Neuroscience 1997; 20:147–152.

Gori S, Seitz А, Ronconi L et al. Multiple Causal Links Between Magnocellular–Dorsal Pathway Deficit and Developmental Dyslexia. Cereb. Cortex, 2015; doi: 10.1093/ cercor/bhv206.

Levashov OV. Funktsinaljnaia asimmetriya magno- i parvocellularnoj (fazicheskoj i tonicheskoj) pri lokaljnih porazheniah mozga i pri disleksii: nejrobiologicheskij podhod. Zhurnal Asimmetria 2009; 3 (2):73 – 98.

Ivanickiy AM, Strelec VB, Korsakov IA. Informatsionnue protsessui mozga I psyhicheskaya deyatelnost. Moskva. Nauka. 1984.

Federmeier KD, Kutas M.Picture the difference: electrophysiological investigations of picture processing in two cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 2002; 40:730–747.

Bezrukih MM. Zriteljnoe vospriyatie kak integrativnaya harakteristika poznavatelnogo razvitya detej 5-7 let. Novie issledovanya, 2008; 1 (14):13–26.

Tseng MH, Chow SM. Perceptual-Motor Function of School-Age Children with Slow Handwriting Speed. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2000; 54 (1): 83–88.

Akhutina TV, Puilaeva NM. Preodolenie trudnostej uchenya: nejropsihologicheski podhod. Piter. 2008.

Simernitskaya EG. Mozg cheloveka I psihicheskie processui v ontogeneze. Moskva. 1985.

Farber DA, Beteleva TG. Formirovanie sistemui zriteljnogo vospriyatiya v ontogeneze. Fiziologya cheloveka, 2005; 31 (5): 26–36.

Petrenko NE, Farber DA. Vozrastnaya dinamika mozgovoj organizatsi opoznaniya fragmentarnuih izobrazhenij u deteij ot 5-6 k 7-8 godam. Novuie issledovanya,2011; 4 (29): 5–14.

Terebova NN. Vozrastnuie osobennosti funktsionaljnoi organizatsii korui golovnogo mozga u detei 5, 6 i 7 let s raznuim urovnem sformirovannosti zriteljnogo vospriyatiya. Avtoreferat na soiskanie uchenoij stepeni kandidata biologicheskih nauk. Moskva. 2010.

Levashov O, Boyeva E. Visual recognition of embedded pictures in left-handed and right-handed children. Perception 1999; 22 European Conference on Visual Perception, Trieste, Italy. Abstract Supplement: 147.

Biziuk AP. Kompendium metodov nejropsihologicheskogo issledovaniya. Sankt-Peterburg. Rech. 2005.

Farber DA, Petrenko NE. Individualjnuie osobennosti zritelnogo opoznaniya u detei predshkolnogo vozrasta. Almanah Novuie issledovaniya, 2012; 1 (30): 31–43.

Semenova LK, Vasileva VV, Tsehmistrenko TA. Strukturnuie preobrazovaniya korui bolshogo mozga cheloveka v postnatalnom ontogeneze. Strukturno-funktsionalnaiya organizatsiya razvivaushevosya mozga. Leningrad. 1990: 8–45.

Akhutina TV, Puilaeva NM. Diagnostika razvitiya zritelno-verbalnuih funkciy. Moskva. 2003.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JSER-2015-0011

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Article Metrics Graph

No metrics found.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.